Skip to main content

The End of Deforestation


I like Ban Ki-Moon, UN Secretary General.  He doesn’t just talk about doing things; he makes things happen.  I refer specifically to a new collaboration between the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and the International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN).  These two organizations intend to restore at least 150 million hectares of forest by 2020 (a hectare is slightly more than 2 acres).  Their joint effort will be announced at the Secretary-General’s Climate Summit on September 23, 2014.

Restoring 150 million hectares of forest, an area about the size of Alaska, would sequester roughly 1 gigaton of carbon dioxide and/or the equivalent thereof every year, reducing the current emissions gap by 11 – 17 percent.  The target date of 2020 is ambitious, but would generate US$85 billion per year in ecosystem services that would benefit the rural poor all 
over the world.

The rate of global deforestation has slowed significantly since the beginning of the 21st century.  However, we still lose 13 million hectares a year (an area the size of Greece).  The willingness of nations rich and poor to sign onto this program is due in large part to the growing realization that forests provide services that could very nearly be termed “priceless.”  Among them are rainfall creation, carbon removal from the atmosphere, storing and purifying water, maintaining soil quality, providing rich habitat, and species maintenance.

Brazil can be cited as an outstanding example of declining deforestation.  It decreased by 70 percent between 2005 and 2013.  This has been due in large part to a moratorium agreed to by the soy and beef industries.  The country has agreed to an 80 percent reduction by 2020.  The Union of Concerned Scientists says that Brazil has “already made a very large contribution to combating climate change – more than that of any other nation on Earth.  For this … Brazil can rightfully be very proud.”  It bears pointing out that, prior to the moratorium, Brazil was the world’s leading contributor to changing climate.

Glenn Hurowitz, of the American consultancy group Climate Advisers and its activist arm, Catapult, is quoted as saying, “ … in some countries we are winning battles against the war on trees … I think it is the beginning of the end.  There are countries where forests are actually regrowing, including Europe, the US, India, China, Vietnam, and even some in Africa.”  Anti-deforestation pledges made by food giants Wilmar, Unilever, and most recently Cargill point to a paradigm shift.

May this be the beginning of a new activism on the part of participant nations and corporations.


With thanks to independent.co.uk and unep.org.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

The Great March for Climate Action

December 23, 2013 – Have you heard about The Great March for Climate Action?   I just learned about it today.   Organizers have determined it will take them 246 days to march from Los Angeles to Washington, D.C.   They are looking for 1,000 people – 20 from each state – to participate.   The march is stopping in many, many locations along the way so that locals can participate for as little as a day, or as long as they like. The march is Ed Fallon’s brainchild.   Ed, along with most of his staff members, is from Iowa, where he served as a state legislator for fourteen years.   He currently hosts a radio program called Fallon Forum.   Fallon began his career as a social activist coordinating the Iowa section of the Great Peace March in 1986.  Ed bases his approach on Great Marches of the past.  Women suffragists marched on Washington on March 3, 1913; Gandhi led the Salt March in India on March 12, 1930; Dr. King led the voting rights march from Selma to Montgomery

Greenland: A State of Rapid Collapse

 September 1, 2020 The good news, such as it is, goes like this: the suspense is over. No need to guess about whether sea level rise will be life-altering by the end of this century or not. It will, at least for the 40 percent of humankind which lives on or near a coastline. That's because all the ice on Greenland is going to melt, according to researchers at Ohio State University (yes, yes, I know - it's THE Ohio State University. Get over yourselves.) Their research appeared in the journal Nature Communications Earth and Environment in August. Total meltdown will take 10,000 years, but enough will have melted by 2100 to cause sea level rise of approximately three feet. That will cover a lot of coastal property, a loss made worse by storms and hurricanes. How have researchers reached this conclusion? By studying almost 40 years of satellite data. Glaciers on Greenland have shrunk so much since the year 2000 that even if global warming came to a complete stop, they would contin